« Commonwealth legislation update | Main | Australian remuneration governance standards for financial institutions and insurers »
ACCC supermarket competition agreement
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has announced that agreement had been reached with Coles Group Limited and Woolworths Limited to phase out all restrictive provisions in supermarket leases.
Both companies have agreed that they will not include restrictive provisions in any new supermarket leases, and in the case of existing supermarket leases, they will not enforce restrictive provisions five years after commencement of trading. This phasing out in the case of current leases takes account of commercial arrangements and rental contracts already in place.
During its Grocery Inquiry in 2008, the ACCC identified a practice where supermarket operators would include tenancy terms which may have prevented shopping centre managers leasing space to any competing supermarkets. This had the potential to impose restrictions on the number of supermarket outlets in centres and consequently fewer options for consumers.
The agreement is in the form of a court enforceable undertaking that has been voluntarily provided by Coles and Woolworths.
September 20, 2009 in Trade Practices | Permalink
Comments
regarding the unfair contract,s i was i victim in dec. 05-jan 06 i am a returned serviceman. i went to a multifranchise agency settled on an 04 BA falcon sold as new [just old stock] was charged nearly 39,000 when i contacted ford and also redbook in 04 that car was only 35,000. the after sales extra,s are different to the one,s in the contract to the finance co. they ifn flated our assetts by 40,000. we never got a copy of the contract until we signed it the payments on that car was 1,024 p/m at that stage i was on 1100 p/f and my wife was on about 390 p/f. even though i begged and begged the finance co they refused to help. i ended up handing the car back in sept 06. been to office of fair trading, no luck there legal aid same thing. i have finally got it to banking ombudsman they have had it for 12 months + and all they seem to be doing is giving the finance co extra time . why??
Posted by: alec chesters | Dec 12, 2010 12:18:30 PM
this is ridiculous experience as u mentioned.
Posted by: Probate Lawyers Sydney | Feb 10, 2012 4:40:27 AM


