How to do powerpoint

Like John Quiggin, I've needed some time to analyse Lawrence Lessig's presentation on Free Culture last week.

Inchoate's post has prompted me to try and record some "take home messages" for the future. (Even though he saw the Supreme Court presentation on Eldred v Ashcroft which I couldn't attend, it seems Lessig's presentation style was the same for both.)

The presentation was the best use of powerpoint by anyone (let alone a law lecturer/academic) that I've ever seen. (In fact my immediate reaction at the end was more like "Whoaaa!!!") Yes, even awesome.

Putting aside disagreements people had about the subject matter (in that room of creators, academics and lawyers, there were a few), Lessig managed to combine the visuals perfectly with his oral argument.

The slides themselves were high impact (black background with red and white text, usually only one word a slide, slides changing every 2 or 3 seconds, all timed perfectly with his speech and in places broken up with an appropriate multi media clip).

He has obviously given similar presentations before (based on other reviews, see here) but I can only admire the amount of preparation required to get a 1 hour plus lecture to that level and am thankful as a member of the audience that he spent such time.

Donald Norman has commented that the best speech is one where no powerpoint is used at all except for pictures. He believes that a darkened room interferes with communication between speaker and audience. He believes that bullet points should be used only as speaker's aids, not visible to the audience.

As a participant in Lessig's audience, I felt that the powerpoint added to and did not detract from the message.

For my part, I will work a lot harder on my future powerpoints (if I use them). I want my audience to react the way I did (and now I know it can be achieved even on a legal topic!).

Copyright: what is fair use?

Malcolm Gladwell's Something Borrowed in the New Yorker is a wonderful non-legal discussion of copyright and plagiarism.

It describes his search for understanding when key words in an article he wrote about a psychiatrist are used in a Tony Award nominated play involving a character based on that person. The real life psychiatrist threatens legal action against the playwright but Gladwell uses the incident to analyse his own feelings, the impact of the allegations of plagiarism on the playwright and whether there is a difference in "borrowing that is transformative and borrowing that is merely derivative".

In the course of his research he speaks to an expert on musicals and an expert on pop songs for comparisons in those fields.

A well-written stimulating personal piece of writing !

via BizzBangBuzz, Pierce Law IP News Blog

Lessig Speaks

Want a demonstration of the vitality and intensity of discussion going on in US over "fair use" of copyright?

Via Bag and Baggage I got a link to a mp3 recording of Professor Lawrence Lessig speaking yesterday at Web 2.0. Back at Bag and Baggage and at the Web 2.0 site are links to the clips Lessig played during his talk to demonstrate his arguments.

Lessig will be in Brisbane in January to speak at an Open Content Licensing/Creative Commons conference. I'm going!

Online music

I have been enjoying the free I Tunes radio player while I sit at my computer. You don't need an I Pod. It has a great range of internet radio stations split into categories.

So it is an appropriate time to be reminded (by this NY Times article) that listening to music online is not unlawful. Only its unauthorised downloading and distribution.

Is IP anti-competitive?

Kim Weatherall and David Starkoff explore this issue here and here respectively.

Free Trade and Mickey Mouse

Via Kim Weatherill comes this link to Matthew Rimmer's submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties on the Australia- USA Fair Trade Agreement. Essentially he argues that the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act 1998 is a poor model for Australia.

Understanding USA

For a lawyer trained in a legal system based on English law, I have always read US blawgs with a sense of confusion and fascination similar to trying to understand gridiron.

Lawrence Lessig's article How I Lost the Big One on the Eldred case on copyright protection gives me some insight into the US Constitution and the passion with which it is discussed.

Referring to a story in the Media

TechLaw Advisor refers to a post by PaidContent.org quoting Reuter's position on blogs referring to its stories: "Infringements of our copyright does not include where bloggers quote from and link back to our original story, or where sites display a headline and link back to reuters.com. We are very comfortable with these practices."

It has been my practice, where I deal in government and business regulatory matters and court decisions, to refer back to the primary source, typically a media release or an actual report, new law or case note on the relevant website. Free email subscription alert services are offered by many Australian government departments (such as the Attorney-General's e-news on copyright) and regulatory bodies (such as the Office of the Federal Privacy Commissioner). And where they don't, services such as Watch that page are helpful.