« Bulletin names Smart 100 IT finalists | Main | Cadbury wins partial retrial on ownership of purple »

When is a work "artistic"?

In Burge v Swarbrick [2007] HCA 17 (26 April 2007), the High Court of Australia considered the meaning of "artistic work" in s 10 and in s 77(1)of the Copyright Act and whether copyright protection for the designer was available for a yacht marketed as the "JS 9000" in Australia, Europe, the United States and elsewhere.

The designer (Swarbrick) failed in his claim because the boat was designed to satisfy functional utilitarian considerations (eg speed, safety) and be mass-produced rather than for artistic purposes.

The designer had not registered the design under the Designs Act.

May 21, 2007 in Legal | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d4c5453ef00d835365f9669e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference When is a work "artistic"?:

Comments

Post a comment